Reporting Featured Items
Publication Event

Improving board assurance of technical and operational risks in mining, MGR 2019: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk, MGR 2019

There are gaps in board assurance on technical and operational risk in mining. There are gaps in current environmental social governance (ESG) and enterprise risk management, especially for geotechnical risk. Chief risk officers (CROs) and audit teams who report to the board’s audit and risk committee are often staffed by accountants and lawyers who provide an essential service, but may not appreciate the science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) aspects of mining, including its technical complexity, variability and uncertainty. This demography tends to focus on commercial, financial and legal risk. Their skill sets mean they may have a blind spot on how STEM mining risks have an impact, including on company performance and innovation (opportunity risks). Additionally, with the digital transformation of mining underway, there is a risk the disrupting ‘digital natives’ (i.e. deep domain experts on digital technology) also lack an understanding of the technical and operational risks of mining and may inadvertently create new risks. Understanding risk in mining requires technical and operational expertise in mining engineering, life-of-mine planning, geotechnical engineering, geology and metallurgy. These professionals need to work alongside traditional risk practitioners and auditors to develop new ways to provide transparency, accountability and assurance to mining company boards.

board assurance audit technical risk operational risk Global Reporting Initiative
Publication

Precision of Particle Size Measurements for Minus 44 Micron Solids from Oil Sands: An Interlaboratory Study

Project to develop a method for measuring fines that would result in “technically sound, statistically defendable, and consistent measurement methodology for oil sands fines (<44-micron particle size) which is applicable across all areas of an oil sands processing facility." Although the reproducibility was poor (not to be used as industry standard), the information gathered during these studies may help laboratories better understand and refine their internal methods as is appropriate.

particle size particle size distribution fines reporting oil sands geotechnical
Publication

Safety Evaluation of Existing Dams (SEED - 1995)

This manual is intended to provide engineering and technical personnel at all levels of Government (Federal, State, and local) and private engineering organizations with sound, comprehensive guidelines and procedures for me examination and evaluation of public and private dams.

Evaluation Dam Safety Modes Causes of Failures Training Duties Examinations Reporting Inspection