The majority of seismic hazard assessment tools are solely based on statistical analyses of several seismic source parameters such as event rate and time, and seismic moment. These analyses are often applied to the entire mining area which can impact the accuracy and reliability of the hazard assessment tool in each zone. Experience has shown that mining geomechanical risk is complex and its mitigation needs a broad understanding of other geotechnical factors such as rock mass properties, geological structures, mining method, stress regime, etc. Since all the contributing parameters and their impact are not entirely understood, it is critical to apply a range of geotechnical/geomechanical analyses in correlation to each other and quantify the changes in the rock mass behaviour. The goal of this paper is to develop a seismic hazard assessment tool calibrated for each geotechnical domain within the mine. To develop the tool, we incorporated mine geotechnical and geological data, seismic source parameters, and tomography analyses from a hard rock underground mine in North America. There exist several sub-vertical faults and one horizontal structure in the mine which create clear contrasts in rock mass behaviour across the structure. The results show good correlation among the different datasets, and a calibrated seismic hazard tool has been developed that provides ongoing updates to the mine operation.
These Guidelines address the risks of accidents or incidents in which a member of the public encounters a hazard created by the presence or operation of a dam.
Geomechanical risk in mining is universally understood to depend on many apparently disparate factors acting together such as stress, stiffness, mine geometry, rock mass character, rock type, structure, excavation rate and volume, blasting, and seismicity. We have worked on many case studies over the years in both underground and open pit mines with the objective of discovering and documenting the correlation of such factors with the experience of geomechanical failure. Whether that failure is slope failure, strainbursting, fault slip-induced rockbursting, roof fall, or any other of many possible failure types, statistical correlations among the different classes of data can be found, and predictive rules for understanding geohazard based on their quantitative combination can be established and deployed in day-to-day operations. This data-driven approach requires application of methods and avoidance of pitfalls that can be standardised into a universally applicable workflow. We discuss the workflow and the pitfalls in analysis to be avoided through case study examples.
Decision Support System for Water Infrastructure Security Human Consequence Module (DSS-WISETM HCOM) is an analytical module for automated assessment of the human consequences of dam-break floods. The National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering (NCCHE) and the University of Mississippi developed the module with funding provided by the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) through a contract with Argonne National Laboratory.
DSS-WISE Lite is a web-based, automated two-dimensional dam-break flood modeling and mapping capability developed by the National Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering (NCCHE), the University of Mississippi. The development of the web-based tool and its operation and maintenance is supported by the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
Secure, web-based graphical user interface and map server providing analytical capabilities and a decision support system for dam/levee security.
This paper reviews the progressive growth of awareness, adoption and practices with respect to geotechnical risk in mining in Australia over the last four decades, with a particular focus on underground mining. Initial experience in the 1980s was drawn from other high-risk industries such as nuclear and petrochemical sectors, and whilst the mining industry recognised the issue of a changing hazard and risk environment, it did not change practices significantly. Subsequent growth in understanding of the evolving discipline of risk management, coupled with major changes in mining legislation to a more enabling legislative framework, have led to a far more risk-aware industry where risk assessment and risk management practices have become a fundamental component of the overall mining management systems. In underground mining, geotechnical risk is at, or close to, the top of the risk priority list for proactive mine management today. The recognition of what are referred to as core risks associated with particular mining methods was a further development in the maturity of the industry management systems, with implications for all levels of management, right from feasibility through to design, planning and operations. One of the problems with the growth of risk-based management practices in Australia is that because we do so many risk assessments and develop so many hazard plans, we have, in some cases, become too blasé about them and do not give due recognition and priority to the ongoing management of important risks with the potential for serious consequences through lack of attention to detail and lack of integration of risk management into the mine management system. In an effort to overcome this issue and place higher priority on the most critical risks facing a mining operation, the International Council of Mining and Metals (ICMM) Critical Control Management (CCM) system, for focusing on the most critical risks, and then directing more attention to the actual control practices required to manage them, has been a valuable trend in recent years. In the Australian coal sector over the last 10 years, the industry-funded RISKGATE system has also been an extremely useful documentation of industry experience and a tool to assist operators either investigate incidents or plan risk assessments on new topics or areas. Geotechnical topics make up at least three of the 18 major topic areas covered by RISKGATE. This paper will briefly outline how RISKGATE operates and is applicable to the industry in the geotechnical space.
Existing hazard potential classifcation systems are numerous and vary within and between the federal and state sectors. These guidelines set forth a hazard potential classifcation system for dams that is simple, clear, concise, and adaptable to any agencys current system. The intent is to provide straightforward defnitions that can be readily understood by the public and applied uniformly by all federal and state dam safety agencies. The guidelines do not establish how the system will be used, such as prescribing specifc design criteria or prioritizing inspections. Those responsibilities remain with the responsible regulatory authority.
This regulation sets standards for the protection of public health, safety and the environment from radiological and non-radiological hazards associated with uranium and thorium ore processing, and disposal of associated wastes. The cross-media standards apply to pollution emissions and site restoration. EPA issued the standards in response to the statutory requirements of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (UMTRCA).
Ground motion over mine sites, while an everyday occurrence, may represent hazards that need to be identified and monitored over time. An accurate and regularly updated overview of surface movement over mining operations is therefore critical as part of an ongoing risk assessment program. By having a complete picture of ground stability, movement patterns which represent potential geotechnical hazards to safety and mine operations can be identified and tracked over time. From routine monitoring to highfrequency updates, interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) technology is increasingly being used to identify a wide range of movement patterns which may be of concern to mine operators and geotechnical engineers. Recent advances in radar image processing algorithms, combined with an increase in the number of satellite systems launched into orbit, have resulted in improvements in the ability of this technology to capture complex and rapid displacement. In particular, the ability to characterise rapid and sudden motion (metres of movement) has increased the utility of InSAR from a practical standpoint in characterising geotechnical hazards. Further exploitation of 2D monitoring approaches in capturing vertical and horizontal movement, particularly for producing displacement vectors along cross sections, can also provide additional insights into hazard characterisation. Key differences between the ability of highresolution imagery to capture complex and rapid deformation in comparison to low-resolution (but freely available) Sentinel imagery are also touched upon. This paper will focus on the practical application of InSAR technology to monitor mine sites around the world, illustrating how new processing approaches and data sources are used in the identification of geomechanical risks that are typically of greatest concern from both an operational and safety standpoint. Examples of results over an active mine site will be shared and a particular emphasis will be placed on selecting the right InSAR tool for helping geotechnical engineers best manage risk due to movement.